Showing posts with label lens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lens. Show all posts

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Half Maxwell's Fish Eye Lens - Dielectric Antenna (FDTD Animation )



This video is the continuation of the series on Luneburg and Maxwell's Fish Eye Lenses (dielectric antennas & lenses). Specifically, we demonstrate the electric field propagation through the Half Maxwell's Fish-Eye lens proposed by James Clark Maxwell in 1860 (J. C. Maxwell, Scientific Papers, I, New York, Dover Publications, 1860).

The relative dielectric permittivity of the full Maxwell fish-eye lens drops from 4 to 1 from its center to the edges via the following formula: epsr(r)=4/(1+(r/a)^2)^2 for r less than "a" (and greater than zero) where "a" is the radius of the lens and r is the radial distance from its center. Since the dielectric permittivity is 1 at the edges and slightly increases towards the center, no surface reflection occurs. Half Lens is basically half of the full Maxwell's lens. We have utilized half circles to represent the increasing dielectric permittivity of the lens. Also at the bottom figure, we plot the exact dielectric permittivity distribution of the lens over the space.

In this simulation, propagation through a 10Lambda diameter Half Maxwell fish-eye lens is demonstrated via 2-dimensional Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations. A point source is located at the a point on the edge of the lens and correspondingly, we observe propagation of a monochromatic sinusoidal source (left) and a short pulse (right) through the lens and onwards. Collimation is clearly observed once the waves emerge from the flat edge of the lens.

References:
A. D. Greenwood and Jian-Ming Jin, "A Field Picture of Wave Propagation in Inhomogeneous Dielectric Lenses", IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 41, No. 5, October 1999

Friday, January 27, 2012

Lüneburg Dielectric Lens - Propagation Animation (FDTD simulation)




We demonstrate the electric field propagation through one of the well-known inhomogeneous dielectric lens, namely the Luneburg Lens proposed by Rudolf Luneburg in 1944 (R. K. Luneburg, The Mathematical Theory of Optics, Providence, Rhode Island, Brown University Press, 1944). The dielectric permittivity of the Luneburg lens drops from 2 to 1 from its center to the edges via the following formula: epsr(r)=2-(r/Radius)^2. Since the dielectric permittivity is 1 at the edges and slightly increases towards the center, no surface reflection occurs. We have utilized circles to represent the increasing dielectric permittivity of the lens.

In this simulation, propagation through a 10Lambda diameter Luneburg lens is compared against the free space. 2-dimensional Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method is utilized for the simulations. A point source is located at the focal point on the surface and once the waves emerge from the other side of the lens, the collimation effect is observed (i.e. cylindrical waves converge to plane waves) where the waves propagate towards the other focal point at infinity.



References:
A. D. Greenwood and Jian-Ming Jin, "A Field Picture of Wave Propagation in Inhomogeneous Dielectric Lenses", IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 41, No. 5, October 1999

Sunday, February 27, 2011

FDTD Simulation of a Half Convex Lens


Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation of a half convex lens when a point source is located at its focal plane in both on-axis (left) and off-axis (right) cases. The points indicated by the small circle are the actual source locations and the third point with the cross sign is the location of symmetry for the off-axis source.

The source locations are located at the focal plane to demonstrate the collimation property of the lenses. Again, to demonstrate the frequency independency of the lens behavior, two short pulses at different central frequencies are fired consecutively and both cases show collimation after exiting the lens.

The lens employed here has a parabolic surface and obviously, it is not perfectly optimized hence the directed signals are not perfectly smooth. For desired far field performance the shape of the lens can be further designed using optimization algorithms integrated with electromagnetic solvers.

Two related papers are:
1) A. V. Boriskin, A. Rolland, R. Sauleau and A. I. Nosich, Assessment of FDTD Accuracy in the Compact Hemielliptic Dielectric Lens Antenna Analysis, IEEE Trans. Antennas and Prop. vol.56, no.3 pp. 758-764, March 2008
2) G. Godi, R. Sauleau and D. Thouroude, Performance of Reduced Size Substrate Lens Antennas for Millimeter-Wave Communications, IEEE Trans. Antennas and Prop. vol.53, no.4 pp. 1278-1286, April 2005

Also see below:
Oblique Plane Wave Reflection From Half Space
Radiation from a Circularly Tapered Dielectric Waveguide
Right Hand Circular Polarization (RHCP) Animation
Linear Polarization Animation
Left Hand Elliptical Polarization (LHEP) Animation
Standing Wave Pattern (SWR) Animation
Electromagnetic Propagation of UWB Short Pulse in Random Medium 
Half Wavelength Dipole Antenna Radiation 
Dipole Antenna Radiation 
Dish Antenna Animation (Parabolic reflector) 
FDTD Simulation of a Half Convex Lens